48
edits
Talk:Generation II: Difference between revisions
→"Two-stage, cat-like evolutionary line"
Force Fire (talk | contribs) (→metal: These days we would've pinned this as spam..) |
|||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
*Generation V introduced {{p|Purrloin}}/{{p|Liepard}} | *Generation V introduced {{p|Purrloin}}/{{p|Liepard}} | ||
It just seems appropriate, especially as readers who aren't aware of this fact might want to know what the other evolutionary lines are. Also, [[Generation I]] also points out the fact that a damaging move varying in type was not introduced and lists those that were in later generations, so it'd also improve consistency. [[User:Haxorus|<span style="color:#968428">'''Hax'''</span>]][[User talk:Haxorus|<span style="color:#4C4646">'''or'''</span>]][[Special:MyContributions|<span style="color:#800517">'''us'''</span>]] 03:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC) | It just seems appropriate, especially as readers who aren't aware of this fact might want to know what the other evolutionary lines are. Also, [[Generation I]] also points out the fact that a damaging move varying in type was not introduced and lists those that were in later generations, so it'd also improve consistency. [[User:Haxorus|<span style="color:#968428">'''Hax'''</span>]][[User talk:Haxorus|<span style="color:#4C4646">'''or'''</span>]][[Special:MyContributions|<span style="color:#800517">'''us'''</span>]] 03:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
You know the same thing is true with fossil pokemon there wasn't two two staged evolution pokemon nor was there any new fossil pokemon,Shouldn't this be notified somewhere in the article? | |||