238
edits
Talk:Gallade (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Possible new category
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
:::In that case...honestly, my own reaction is mostly, "So?". (If others want to express their own opinion, that's fine; that's just mine.) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 14:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC) | :::In that case...honestly, my own reaction is mostly, "So?". (If others want to express their own opinion, that's fine; that's just mine.) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 14:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::It's definitely ambiguously necessary, but I'm pleased to see how many examples actually exist - I forgot to count eeveelutions entirely - and I certainly didn't mean to say it should be a category ''because'' few Pokémon, even one, are in that weird situation, I really meant the seeming rarity of it intrigued me, and I wanted to see if there were other examples before pressing the creation of a category. Still... there's only 18 of them, so I'll leave it to others to decide if it's warranted. We may even get new additions to this "category" (patent pending) when Sun and Moon come out! At the very least, the category name could most likely be worded better than my initial attempt, and actually applying the category to the pre-evolutions might not be a bad idea... Raises a question in Gallade's case to be fair, as that's a branched evolution, but. Yeah. EDIT: Shedinja too, actually, so 19. [[User:Draceon|Draceon]] ([[User talk:Draceon|talk]]) 21:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC) | ::::It's definitely ambiguously necessary, but I'm pleased to see how many examples actually exist - I forgot to count eeveelutions entirely - and I certainly didn't mean to say it should be a category ''because'' few Pokémon, even one, are in that weird situation, I really meant the seeming rarity of it intrigued me, and I wanted to see if there were other examples before pressing the creation of a category. Still... there's only 18 of them, so I'll leave it to others to decide if it's warranted. We may even get new additions to this "category" (patent pending) when Sun and Moon come out! At the very least, the category name could most likely be worded better than my initial attempt, and actually applying the category to the pre-evolutions might not be a bad idea... Raises a question in Gallade's case to be fair, as that's a branched evolution, but. Yeah. EDIT: Shedinja too, actually, so 19. [[User:Draceon|Draceon]] ([[User talk:Draceon|talk]]) 21:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::I intentionally left out {{p|Shedinja}} because it doesn't really ''evolve'' from Nincada per se; Ninjask is its evolution and Shedinja is just... there. I wouldn't personally include it in this list. However. For some reason I could swear I remember that this little bit of trivia used to exist on some pages, such as Swablu or Altaria's, some long time ago, and was since removed. I distinctly recall seeing something about how Swablu changes its primary type upon evolution (which was rare), and I can't imagine anywhere else where I would have seen it. | |||
:::::And Tiddlywinks, you say "So?", but there are a lot of really arbitrary categories on this wiki that would make a lot of other people say the same. For example, there's got to be "category" for every possible BST, most of which have only one Pokémon included in them. There's also a "category" for each and every method of evolution, one of which containing {{p|Feebas|every single Pokémon in the universe that evolves using a Prism Scale}}. Therefore, I hardly think that a lack of entries makes a category unworthy of creation. I'm still not sure how to phrase such a category, though. — [[User:Kianglo|<span style="color:#6900CC"><b>KiAN</b></span><span style="color:#000000"><b>GLO</b></span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kianglo|<span style="color:#6900cc"><u>TA</u></span><span style="color:#000000"><u>LK</u></span>]]</sup> 04:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC) | |||