Talk:Fairy (type): Difference between revisions

m
Line 199: Line 199:
::Oh really? So it says elsewhere on the page how many Kanto Region Pokémon were converted to Fairy types? And Johto, Hoenn, Sinnoh, & Unova too? I don't think so. All I saw was TOTAL number, not a per region number. So don't put it in the trivia section. Put it elsewhere, like the same section where it says the Total number. [[User:DarienLeonhart|DarienLeonhart]] ([[User talk:DarienLeonhart|talk]]) 15:15, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
::Oh really? So it says elsewhere on the page how many Kanto Region Pokémon were converted to Fairy types? And Johto, Hoenn, Sinnoh, & Unova too? I don't think so. All I saw was TOTAL number, not a per region number. So don't put it in the trivia section. Put it elsewhere, like the same section where it says the Total number. [[User:DarienLeonhart|DarienLeonhart]] ([[User talk:DarienLeonhart|talk]]) 15:15, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Either leave it in or take it off the other 17 type pages. Otherwise, we're being inconsistent, and that's worse than being redundant. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 17:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Either leave it in or take it off the other 17 type pages. Otherwise, we're being inconsistent, and that's worse than being redundant. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 17:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
:Add a sentence to the current number part, saying how many had their types changed when the type was introduced. The trivia is redundant and therefore unnecessary. Each trivia point should be judged on its ''own'' merits. Inconsistency between pages isn't a strong enough reason to keep redundant trivia, and "we have X so why not Y?" reasoning is almost never a strong enough reason anywhere. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 21:33, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
16,071

edits