94
edits
Talk:Dialga (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Name: new section
Mewtwomaster (talk | contribs) |
Mpcamel1729 (talk | contribs) (→Name: new section) |
||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
== Based on "''Amphicoelias" fragillimus''? == | == Based on "''Amphicoelias" fragillimus''? == | ||
I have no idea how people deduce that. To most people, "''Amphicoelias''" would appear as ''Diplodocus'' did in Walking With Dinosaurs, not like a brachiosaurid or something. Granted that a 45* neck angle now seems probable in most if not all sauropods, but why single out "''A''". ''fragillimus'' and not something more well known, such as good old ''Brachiosaurus'' (which i must say resembles Diagla far more). I mean, theres debate as to weather "''A''". ''fragillimus'' is even valid, so if you must use a diplodocid, why not ''Diplodocus'' itself, or perhaps even ''Apatosaurus'' (ignore the ridiculous notion that "Amphicoelias brontodiplodocus" represents all diplodocids from the morrison formation). [[User:Spinodontosaurus|Spinodontosaurus]] 20:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC) | I have no idea how people deduce that. To most people, "''Amphicoelias''" would appear as ''Diplodocus'' did in Walking With Dinosaurs, not like a brachiosaurid or something. Granted that a 45* neck angle now seems probable in most if not all sauropods, but why single out "''A''". ''fragillimus'' and not something more well known, such as good old ''Brachiosaurus'' (which i must say resembles Diagla far more). I mean, theres debate as to weather "''A''". ''fragillimus'' is even valid, so if you must use a diplodocid, why not ''Diplodocus'' itself, or perhaps even ''Apatosaurus'' (ignore the ridiculous notion that "Amphicoelias brontodiplodocus" represents all diplodocids from the morrison formation). [[User:Spinodontosaurus|Spinodontosaurus]] 20:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Name == | |||
Do we really need to say that day is a unit of time? | |||