80
edits
Talk:Ash Ketchum/Archive 5: Difference between revisions
Talk:Ash Ketchum/Archive 5 (view source)
Revision as of 03:16, 10 September 2010
, 10 September 2010→This is getting ridiculous...
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 348: | Line 348: | ||
: I just realized...what are we going to do about Gliscor? I mean...unlike all the other in training pokemon..it was never mentioned if it went back or stayed with ash (and you know what usually happens) should it be put as Status unknown? [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 16:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | : I just realized...what are we going to do about Gliscor? I mean...unlike all the other in training pokemon..it was never mentioned if it went back or stayed with ash (and you know what usually happens) should it be put as Status unknown? [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 16:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea, but we'll leave it alone for now. Ironic how the template for Ash's Pokémon has been right, even now, while the article's wrong... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#DAA520"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 16:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | ::Maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea, but we'll leave it alone for now. Ironic how the template for Ash's Pokémon has been right, even now, while the article's wrong... [[User:Ht14|<span style="color:#DAA520"><sup>'''''ht'''''</sup></span>]][[User talk:Ht14|<span style="color:#C0C0C0"><small>''14''</small></span>]] 16:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Yeah, the question about Gliscor's current location is what I want to know the answer to. I would've thought it stays with Ash in the end, but can't make statements that aren't so true without confirmation. Which gets me thinking if Gible is still in the party with the other 4 and Pikachu. But meanwhile, I agree, the On Hand/Party ought to be updated, even though the DP series is over. --[[User:The1stpkmnfan|The1stpkmnfan]] 03:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC) | |||