84
edits
Talk:Ash's Talonflame: Difference between revisions
→When Fletchling evolves
EnosShayrem (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::As Glik said, too specific. And since it wasn't a Fire-type at the time of capture, it does not apply. [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] ([[User talk:Ataro|talk]]) 00:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | ::As Glik said, too specific. And since it wasn't a Fire-type at the time of capture, it does not apply. [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] ([[User talk:Ataro|talk]]) 00:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::It seems somewhat less specific when you shorten it to "Ash's first Fire-type Pokémon that he didn't rescue in some way", but, again, it wasn't Fire-type at capture, so whatever. -- [[User:EnosShayrem|EnosShayrem]][[User_talk:EnosShayrem|<sub>talk</sub>]] 00:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | :::It seems somewhat less specific when you shorten it to "Ash's first Fire-type Pokémon that he didn't rescue in some way", but, again, it wasn't Fire-type at capture, so whatever. -- [[User:EnosShayrem|EnosShayrem]][[User_talk:EnosShayrem|<sub>talk</sub>]] 00:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::: While I agree with the statement above, It would seem more logical to say "After its evolution, it became the first fire type Ash did not rescue in any way", This gives the readers the information that it was AFTER it evolved. But what I would like to know is where is the evidence of its evolution? Thanks [[User:Waterninja12345|Waterninja12345]] ([[User talk:Waterninja12345|talk]]) 18:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC) | |||