Bulbapedia talk:Nominations for administratorship: Difference between revisions

Line 36: Line 36:
The nomination should be for someone who is clearly an experienced member, and is seen fairly often around the 'pedia.
The nomination should be for someone who is clearly an experienced member, and is seen fairly often around the 'pedia.
Don't bother saying "if such and such doesn't have the experience take the powers of them again". It's just a waste of time. [[User:GlinnMgraw|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Glinn</span>]] [[User_talk:GlinnMgraw|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Mgraw</span>]] 14:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Don't bother saying "if such and such doesn't have the experience take the powers of them again". It's just a waste of time. [[User:GlinnMgraw|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Glinn</span>]] [[User_talk:GlinnMgraw|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Mgraw</span>]] 14:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
:His contributions are good. He deserves to be an admin based on what he has done and tried to do. I said if he goes corrupt then take the powers away, but he wont go corrupt. he will be a good admin. Im 100% sure. --[[User:Guardian|<font color="#0000FF">Guardian</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Guardian|<font color="#FFFF00"> of</font>]][[User talk:Guardian|<font color="#FF0000"> Earth</font>]] |[[GSDS|<font color="#00FF00">SGMS 2010</font>]] 14:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
1,099

edits