Bulbapedia talk:Project TCG/Archive/1: Difference between revisions

Bulbapedia talk:Project TCG/Archive/1 (view source)

Revision as of 09:44, 13 March 2009

1,659 bytes added , 13 March 2009

→‎Merging Card List

Plau

540

edits

@@ Line 145: / Line 145: @@
 I propose that we should merge the Card list in the English and Japanese Set List. With sortable tables it'll be easy to rearrange the order to either Japanese of English. For cards that are only in the Japanese/English set, we leave a note explaining why it's not in the other set. This way, it is much easier to see how the two sets relate to each other. I've used {{TCG|Jungle}} and [[List of Pokémon Trading Card Game expansions]] as examples of how this could work. - [[User:Plau|plau]] 01:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 :I personally don't see a problem with the way it was. The way you have it on Jungle can get quite confusing, and when cards aren't in the same Japanese as English sets *points to things like {{TCG|EX Emerald}}* it will get a whole mass of redirects, crazy page links, and such a hassle for things like the{{TCG|"PCG-P" Promotional cards}}. I do like what you did on the expansion list, but I really would like to avoid the card lists like that. I think seperated keeps them much better organized, especiially when things don't have Japanese card numbers, or other information. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 01:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
+::First, to address the problems you have. This is intended primarily intended for general release sets that have both English and Japanese releases. For sets like EX Emerald, it was designed as an English exclusive set anyways. For Promotional cards, since many of them are only promos in their area of release, so like EX Emerald it would not be have the same treatment. My main problem with what we're doing now has a huge repeat of information. Everything except for the order and the different cards would be a repeat. In what way is it confusing? If it is, it's something I'd like to rectify. As for the note explaining, let's take {{TCG|Secret Wonders}} for example.
+{| {{graytable2|sortable}}
+|- style="background: #eaeaea;"
+!No.
+!JP Order
+!Collection No.
+!Card Name
+!Type
+!Level
+!Rarity
+!Note
+|-
+| 2 || 22 || DPBP#009  || {{TCG ID|Secret Wonders|Blastoise|2}} || {{e|Water}} || 52 || {{rar|Rare Holo}} ||
+|-
+| 3 || 29 || DPBP#006 || {{TCG ID|Secret Wonders|Charizard|3}} || {{e|Fire}} || 55 ||{{rar|Rare Holo}} ||
+|-
+| - || 45 || - || {{TCG ID|Great Encounters|Palkia LV.X|106}}{{tt|*|''Pushed back to Great Encounters''}} || {{e|Water}} || '''''X''''' || {{rar|Rare Holo}} ||
+|-
+| 7 || - || DPBP#332 || {{TCG ID|Secret Wonders|Gardevoir|7}} || {{e|Psychic}} || 55 || {{rar|Rare Holo}} || ''Brought forward from {{TCG|Moonlit Pursuit/Dawn Dash}}
+|}
+We could have the note like the Palkia LV.X (using the {{t|tt}} template). Alternatively, we use use the method for Gardevoir and have a note column. With this we can greatly reduce the repeated information and make the page look less cluttered. - [[User:Plau|plau]] 09:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)