1,701
edits
Talk:Diggersby (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Name origin
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
"Rood" fits better. Since Bunnelby's japanese name is Horub''ee'', it woul make sense for Diggersby's to be Hor''oo''d we still need the trademarked romanization by the way. I say keep it because only you have an issue with it. --<b>[[User talk:Relicant|<span style="color:#EBEBEB;">The</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Relicant|<span style="color:#F08030;">Truth</span>]]</b> aka Relicant 15:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | "Rood" fits better. Since Bunnelby's japanese name is Horub''ee'', it woul make sense for Diggersby's to be Hor''oo''d we still need the trademarked romanization by the way. I say keep it because only you have an issue with it. --<b>[[User talk:Relicant|<span style="color:#EBEBEB;">The</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Relicant|<span style="color:#F08030;">Truth</span>]]</b> aka Relicant 15:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:''How'' does rood "fit"? If the only arguments you can present are "that might be how the trademarked name is spelled", or "that's the translation of part of its name", then should we also mention {{wp|bee}} as a name origin for {{p|Bunnelby}}/Horubee, or "shadow" (kage) for {{p|Charmander}}/Hitokage? No, because those sorts of reasons are not sufficient in and of themselves. It has to make some sense. ...And "rood" doesn't make any sense for Diggersby. So it shouldn't be mentioned, the same as "bee" and "shadow" aren't fit to be mentioned for Horubee and Hitokage. Spelling, all by itself, is irrelevant. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 18:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | :''How'' does rood "fit"? If the only arguments you can present are "that might be how the trademarked name is spelled", or "that's the translation of part of its name", then should we also mention {{wp|bee}} as a name origin for {{p|Bunnelby}}/Horubee, or "shadow" (kage) for {{p|Charmander}}/Hitokage? No, because those sorts of reasons are not sufficient in and of themselves. It has to make some sense. ...And "rood" doesn't make any sense for Diggersby. So it shouldn't be mentioned, the same as "bee" and "shadow" aren't fit to be mentioned for Horubee and Hitokage. Spelling, all by itself, is irrelevant. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 18:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::when I looked up a definition of rood it said it was a measurement of land area and Diggersby is a Ground type. the rest of your argument was pointless. Horudo containing "''rood''" is the same case as Chesnaught containing "''knight''"--<b>[[User talk:Relicant|<span style="color:#EBEBEB;">The</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Relicant|<span style="color:#F08030;">Truth</span>]]</b> aka Relicant 20:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | |||