597
edits
Talk:Stats judge: Difference between revisions
→Redundancy
Stratelier (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
In the Gen III section, is there any reason to have ''both'' the table ''and'' the quotes? I was almost [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BeBold bold] enough to change it myself, but thought I should get some others' opinions first. The table adds nothing, so I really think we should cut it (and, while we're at it, go get the exact quotes from Pt and then cut that table, too, so all three Gen sections will match). Anyone agree/disagree? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 22:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | In the Gen III section, is there any reason to have ''both'' the table ''and'' the quotes? I was almost [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BeBold bold] enough to change it myself, but thought I should get some others' opinions first. The table adds nothing, so I really think we should cut it (and, while we're at it, go get the exact quotes from Pt and then cut that table, too, so all three Gen sections will match). Anyone agree/disagree? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 22:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
: I agree there is a lot of redundancy in this article (given that the ranges for each description have always been the same) and it could really benefit from some better organization overall. I just added a summary table near the top of the article, un-headered much of the Gen 3 section, and cut out some of the redundancy from Gen-specific sections in general. --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 20:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Official name? == | == Official name? == | ||