413
edits
Talk:Gender: Difference between revisions
→Fine, don't include the "unofficial" chart, but...: Counterparts are listed elsewhere too, so why not here?
(→Fine, don't include the "unofficial" chart, but...: Counterparts are listed elsewhere too, so why not here?) |
|||
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
::::Okay, sorry for jumping to conclusions a bit, I did not notice there had been another reversion in there. (For the record, though, 0danmaster wasn't warned about edit warring either; only I was, though if there was a war it was in RESPONSE to my edit.) Aspects of the old chart were questionably fanon (well, Rufflet/Vullaby was a reach, version counterparts or no) but fine, my main concern was the loss of the information in its entirety - if I had noticed the re-reversion without the page getting locked, I'd have given up and thrown them into the lower chart, which would have completely pre-empted any edit war. A lot of my reaction is that I do ''not'' like being accused of something I did not do, and this isn't the first time accusations of things I did not do have been thrown my way on this Wiki. --[[User:HeroicJay|HeroicJay]] ([[User talk:HeroicJay|talk]]) 08:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC) | ::::Okay, sorry for jumping to conclusions a bit, I did not notice there had been another reversion in there. (For the record, though, 0danmaster wasn't warned about edit warring either; only I was, though if there was a war it was in RESPONSE to my edit.) Aspects of the old chart were questionably fanon (well, Rufflet/Vullaby was a reach, version counterparts or no) but fine, my main concern was the loss of the information in its entirety - if I had noticed the re-reversion without the page getting locked, I'd have given up and thrown them into the lower chart, which would have completely pre-empted any edit war. A lot of my reaction is that I do ''not'' like being accused of something I did not do, and this isn't the first time accusations of things I did not do have been thrown my way on this Wiki. --[[User:HeroicJay|HeroicJay]] ([[User talk:HeroicJay|talk]]) 08:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::PS. Forgot to say: But I shouldn't have taken it out on you since you didn't make that accusation, so again, sorry. --[[User:HeroicJay|HeroicJay]] ([[User talk:HeroicJay|talk]]) 08:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC) | ::::PS. Forgot to say: But I shouldn't have taken it out on you since you didn't make that accusation, so again, sorry. --[[User:HeroicJay|HeroicJay]] ([[User talk:HeroicJay|talk]]) 08:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::::I don't get any of this! There are many Pokémon to be stated counterparts of each other in their trivias. Mostly because of a shared location, similar movesets, similar ways to evolve, similar ways of obtaining and simalar base stats. But we can't list Miltank and Tauros here as being counterparts, and that they are also (maybe like coincidentally) of the opposite gender? That makes no sense! [[User:Nickvang|Nickvang]] ([[User talk:Nickvang|talk]]) 19:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC) | |||