13,668
edits
(Undo revision 1954064 by Jo The Marten (talk) It's not speculation... It's something I found that I think should be added.) |
(Undo revision 1954501 by Nutter Butter (talk) It is speculation unless an official source confirms it. A random Youtube video is not an official source.) |
||
Line 688: | Line 688: | ||
:Look, that's nice, but our encounter rates are found by extracting data from the game, not through large-scale trials. If you were trying to prove something else, pleese reply here, because I don't know what your point is. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 03:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | :Look, that's nice, but our encounter rates are found by extracting data from the game, not through large-scale trials. If you were trying to prove something else, pleese reply here, because I don't know what your point is. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 03:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
::This isn't large-scale. It's a point of reference for people who don't want to wait for every aspect of the game to be reverse engineered. [[User:M.Shepherd|M.Shepherd]] 19:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | ::This isn't large-scale. It's a point of reference for people who don't want to wait for every aspect of the game to be reverse engineered. [[User:M.Shepherd|M.Shepherd]] 19:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
edits