19,406
edits
Talk:Ash's Talonflame: Difference between revisions
→When Fletchling evolves
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
When Fletchling evolves, would it be trivia worthy that Fletchinder would become Ash's first {{t|Fire|Fire-type}} Pokémon to not have either been previously owned and abandoned by an abusive trainer, was attempted to have been caught by one, nor been attacked by a hoard of wild Pokémon before its capture? Or does that only apply to Pokémon that were Fire-types to begin with? --[[User:PKMNAdventurer|PKMNAdventurer]] ([[User talk:PKMNAdventurer|talk]]) 00:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | When Fletchling evolves, would it be trivia worthy that Fletchinder would become Ash's first {{t|Fire|Fire-type}} Pokémon to not have either been previously owned and abandoned by an abusive trainer, was attempted to have been caught by one, nor been attacked by a hoard of wild Pokémon before its capture? Or does that only apply to Pokémon that were Fire-types to begin with? --[[User:PKMNAdventurer|PKMNAdventurer]] ([[User talk:PKMNAdventurer|talk]]) 00:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I'd say it' not notable because of how many caveats you have to add on to make it unique. [[User:Glik|Glik]] ([[User talk:Glik|talk]]) 00:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | :I'd say it' not notable because of how many caveats you have to add on to make it unique. [[User:Glik|Glik]] ([[User talk:Glik|talk]]) 00:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
::As Glik said, too specific. And since it wasn't a Fire-type at the time of capture, it does not apply. [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] ([[User talk:Ataro|talk]]) 00:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC) | |||