Talk:Looker: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 66: Line 66:
*I would have written it off as coincidence, until a minor character in ''The End of Time Part 1'' says that The Doctor is "a bit of a looker". It's impossible to say either way, since THAT could also be a coincidence. - [[User:Nebula|Nebula]] 03:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
*I would have written it off as coincidence, until a minor character in ''The End of Time Part 1'' says that The Doctor is "a bit of a looker". It's impossible to say either way, since THAT could also be a coincidence. - [[User:Nebula|Nebula]] 03:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
::Apparently the bit about Looker being a possible Doctor Who reference has been taken out again... for being an "opinion", in that case, how come the Zenigata bit hasn't been removed? [[User:Dojorkan|Dojorkan]] 03:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
::Apparently the bit about Looker being a possible Doctor Who reference has been taken out again... for being an "opinion", in that case, how come the Zenigata bit hasn't been removed? [[User:Dojorkan|Dojorkan]] 03:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
:::Can I bring this up again? Because I agree with Dojorkan. He is very similar to both characters, and both parts are opinions, none of them confirmed or denied. So why should Koichi be listed and not the Doctor? Unless there's something I'm missing? --[[User:Darach-bcv|Darach-bcv]] 16:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


== He speaks with odd grammatical constructs, implying that he is not a native speaker of the national language.  ==
== He speaks with odd grammatical constructs, implying that he is not a native speaker of the national language.  ==
3

edits