User talk:Maverick Nate: Difference between revisions

→‎Evolutions: new section
(→‎Quick question!: new section)
(→‎Evolutions: new section)
Line 83: Line 83:


Hi! I'm fairly new here, and while flipping through random pages to look for things that need editing, I noticed that the image we have for EX Legend Maker {{TCG ID|EX Legend Maker|Aron|48}} has some sort of funky scuff mark (maybe pen?) near the 20 for Headbutt's damage. Is there a way we could get a better image? Is there someone else I should notify to get a better picture? (If I had the card I would scan it myself but alas...) I'm still finding my way around here so thanks for any help! [[User:Terra Antiqua|Terra Antiqua]] ([[User talk:Terra Antiqua|talk]]) 21:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I'm fairly new here, and while flipping through random pages to look for things that need editing, I noticed that the image we have for EX Legend Maker {{TCG ID|EX Legend Maker|Aron|48}} has some sort of funky scuff mark (maybe pen?) near the 20 for Headbutt's damage. Is there a way we could get a better image? Is there someone else I should notify to get a better picture? (If I had the card I would scan it myself but alas...) I'm still finding my way around here so thanks for any help! [[User:Terra Antiqua|Terra Antiqua]] ([[User talk:Terra Antiqua|talk]]) 21:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
== Evolutions ==
I mean, I don't want to direct traffic to the TCG without your consent :P ..but I knew about the hatnote, which I think is just fine for those who type in "Evolution" and expect to land at the TCG expansion. And it's really hard for me to imagine how someone typing in "Evolutions" is that much more likely to look for the concept rather than the expansion that a hatnote is the way to go. I was actually torn between a disambiguation and a redirect to the TCG (and another hatnote there). So, are you really sure? Or is there maybe something more to it, something I'm missing? [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 23:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)