443
edits
User talk:Ataro/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Pikachu (Pokémon) FAC vote: new section
m (→{{p|Keldeo}}: relinking - sorry) |
(→Pikachu (Pokémon) FAC vote: new section) |
||
| Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
: Yes but in the story he isn't really counted as one (hence the three musketeers) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | : Yes but in the story he isn't really counted as one (hence the three musketeers) [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 22:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: No one's arguing against the basis and inspiration being the Three Musketeers, but I'm saying for the sake of Pokémon it's part of the set. I think it's awkward just leaving it out like that. In the other cases of related Pokémon in [[Legendary trio]] it's the [[trio master|leader]] who's excluded (which if you take the reference strongly would be wrong if he's an original member of the bunch), but Keldeo left out just leaves him as a legendary, non-leader, seemingly oxymoronically unimportant (but of course he is because he's a legendary) all alone, it's just wrong, like he's not cool enough because he's based on d'Artagnan. They should either all be there (which is wrong because there 4, not 3) or none of them should - "All for one, and one for all". --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 23:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | :: No one's arguing against the basis and inspiration being the Three Musketeers, but I'm saying for the sake of Pokémon it's part of the set. I think it's awkward just leaving it out like that. In the other cases of related Pokémon in [[Legendary trio]] it's the [[trio master|leader]] who's excluded (which if you take the reference strongly would be wrong if he's an original member of the bunch), but Keldeo left out just leaves him as a legendary, non-leader, seemingly oxymoronically unimportant (but of course he is because he's a legendary) all alone, it's just wrong, like he's not cool enough because he's based on d'Artagnan. They should either all be there (which is wrong because there 4, not 3) or none of them should - "All for one, and one for all". --[[User talk:Venomoth|☯ ]][[User:Venomoth|*Ɣℯ№ӎօṫհ*]][[User talk:Venomoth| ☯]] 23:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
== [[talk:Pikachu (Pokémon)/Featured article candidate|Pikachu (Pokémon) FAC vote]] == | |||
Sorry if I am wrong about this but someone, either you or [[User:Venomoth|Venemoth]], posted under the support section on this page and did not change the number of support votes in the section title. Looking at the history of the page makes me think this was you. It's not a big deal it's just that if you do not change the number of support votes then your vote does not count. If you just wanted to post a comment on the page but did not want to cast a vote there is a section specifically for comments at the bottom of the page. Please change the number of support votes if you did want to vote. Thank you--[[User:Alex726|<font color="#7D7D7D">'''Alex'''</font><font color="#000000">'''726'''</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Alex726|<font color="#007100">'''cont</font><font color="#DF0000">ribu</font><font color="#0000A0">tions'''</font>]]</sub> 15:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC) | |||