5
edits
Talk:Fairy (type): Difference between revisions
→Offensive and Defensive Charactaristics
Mindlord0013 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 283: | Line 283: | ||
:I agree with your assessment of this particular section, but I disagree with your proposed solution. I'd much rather just delete the sections altogether, as they (A) attract editors who try to load them with non-neutral competitive meta and (B), if the meta is removed, don't do much except regurgitate type coverage and statistical averages, which can already be seen on the templates on the top half of the page. | :I agree with your assessment of this particular section, but I disagree with your proposed solution. I'd much rather just delete the sections altogether, as they (A) attract editors who try to load them with non-neutral competitive meta and (B), if the meta is removed, don't do much except regurgitate type coverage and statistical averages, which can already be seen on the templates on the top half of the page. | ||
:You can see this on the [[Dragon (type)]] page you just pointed out — the only fact in the entire section that isn't part of those templates is that most Dragon-types have wide movepools, which is itself vague and potentially opinionated (how wide constitutes wide enough to be worth mentioning? how many Dragon-types is enough to be worth mentioning?). I think these sections have no value that isn't already better-executed elsewhere on the page, so we should mercilessly and indiscriminately delete them. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 04:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC) | :You can see this on the [[Dragon (type)]] page you just pointed out — the only fact in the entire section that isn't part of those templates is that most Dragon-types have wide movepools, which is itself vague and potentially opinionated (how wide constitutes wide enough to be worth mentioning? how many Dragon-types is enough to be worth mentioning?). I think these sections have no value that isn't already better-executed elsewhere on the page, so we should mercilessly and indiscriminately delete them. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 04:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
:: I think this is a good idea, but should be brought up with the bulbapedia admins (as it is quite a substantial change). Who would be the best person to query regarding this issue? --[[User:Mindlord0013|Mindlord0013]] ([[User talk:Mindlord0013|talk]]) 08:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC) | |||