Talk:U: Difference between revisions

Add topic
Active discussions
m (→‎Sprites: redlink)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Why?==
==Why?==
Why delete this? [[User:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">Tina</span>]][[User talk:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">The</span>]][[Kirlia (Pokémon)|<span style="color:#E75480;">Kirlia</span>]] ♥ [[Image:281MS.gif]] 01:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Why delete this? [[User:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">Tina</span>]][[User talk:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">The</span>]][[Kirlia (Pokémon)|<span style="color:#E75480;">Kirlia</span>]] ♥ 01:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
:Because it's junk.  NO ONE at all wants to read about a glitched {{p|Charizard}}.  By that standard, why not have a seperate article for EVERY Pokémon that can be caught using the Mew glitch?  I say merge it with the trivia on the Pokémon's page.  It's far too trivial to warrant its own article.  Even then, a glitch Pokémon should only have some reference on here if it's especially notable in some way, and then I think they should all be combined into one article, "Glitch Pokémon."        -[[Image:Spr 3e 186.gif|30px]][[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">Politoed</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">666</span>]][[Image:Spr 3e 186.gif|30px]]
:Because it's junk.  NO ONE at all wants to read about a glitched {{p|Charizard}}.  By that standard, why not have a seperate article for EVERY Pokémon that can be caught using the Mew glitch?  I say merge it with the trivia on the Pokémon's page.  It's far too trivial to warrant its own article.  Even then, a glitch Pokémon should only have some reference on here if it's especially notable in some way, and then I think they should all be combined into one article, "Glitch Pokémon."        -[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">Politoed</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">666</span>]]
::The fact that no one else has a vendetta against glitch Pokémon suggests that you can't talk for everyone.  Some people happen find it interesting and the glitch category has been around for two years without a fuss.  Also, why are you targeting the ''good'' quality articles? --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Fabu-Vinny|C]]-[[User:Fabu-Vinny/Sandbox|S]]</sup> 02:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
::The fact that no one else has a vendetta against glitch Pokémon suggests that you can't talk for everyone.  Some people happen find it interesting and the glitch category has been around for two years without a fuss.  Also, why are you targeting the ''good'' quality articles? --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Fabu-Vinny|C]]-[[User:Fabu-Vinny/Sandbox|S]]</sup> 02:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


Line 40: Line 40:


This Pokémon has the letter "u" in its name, can i move it? --[[User:Rsrdaman|<span style="color:#000000">'''×Rsr'''</span>]][[User:Rsrdaman|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''daman×'''</span>]] 17:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
This Pokémon has the letter "u" in its name, can i move it? --[[User:Rsrdaman|<span style="color:#000000">'''×Rsr'''</span>]][[User:Rsrdaman|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''daman×'''</span>]] 17:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
== Interest in glitches ==
I am very interested in glitches. I have to help them avoid game freezes. I'm '''extremly'''
interested in this glitch Pokémon. Any info? --[[User:UltimateglitchDECTETIVE|UltimateglitchDECTETIVE]] ([[User talk:UltimateglitchDECTETIVE|talk]]) 21:34, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
:Have you read the page? There's information there. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 21:38, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
==Why?==
Does this thing learn Self-Destruct via TM36, or a move called Tm36? [[User:GalarChamp Cinderace|Hello, it&#39;s me, GalarChamp Cinderace!]] ([[User talk:GalarChamp Cinderace|talk]]) 18:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
: Simply clicking on that move moves you to the page with Glitch moves. Yes, move named TM-36 exists. Yes, this pokemon learns TM-36, not Self-Destruct. [[User:Itan|Itan]] ([[User talk:Itan|talk]]) 19:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:40, 24 March 2021

Why?

Why delete this? TinaTheKirlia ♥ 01:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Because it's junk. NO ONE at all wants to read about a glitched Charizard. By that standard, why not have a seperate article for EVERY Pokémon that can be caught using the Mew glitch? I say merge it with the trivia on the Pokémon's page. It's far too trivial to warrant its own article. Even then, a glitch Pokémon should only have some reference on here if it's especially notable in some way, and then I think they should all be combined into one article, "Glitch Pokémon." -Politoed666
The fact that no one else has a vendetta against glitch Pokémon suggests that you can't talk for everyone. Some people happen find it interesting and the glitch category has been around for two years without a fuss. Also, why are you targeting the good quality articles? --FabuVinny T-C-S 02:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

I for one find it fascinating, and like browsing through al lthe glitches. I like this wiki particularly more than most since everything is cited and thigns aren't just mentioned if they can be as trivial like most wiki's Sk2k52 04:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Glitchy Charizard Sprite?

I've never captured this Glitch before and because of that I don't know the sprite. At first I thought it was just a normal Charizard Sprite from Yellow. However, with Glitches I'm never too sure. So does anybody know what this Glitch looks like? -- Boxman, a guy who works with Glitches.

no idea. OrigamiGuy-T-C-M 18:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Actually learns TM's rather than TM abilities?

Can anyone confirm this? Sk2k52 04:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. It happens with Glitch Pokémon. — THE TROM — 22:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


Sprites

How 'bout using the sprites of Glitchy Charizard's evolution line in Yellow? In other words, change the sprites in the evolution box to Yellow sprites...Db 17:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

(Same as Talk:ゥ_(_Z4)Well, using the most recent sprite for Pokémon the exist later on helps to differentiate them from the standard Pokémon. --SnorlaxMonster. Help here 07:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Evolution

ok i don't get its evolution set up. it doesn't even make sense.can some one explain it to me? --Tagged 23:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I think that because it's a glitch, it will "evolve" into either a glitched Magnemite or a glitched Geodude when it reaches level 255. I could be wrong, though; I never played Yellow, much less ever used the Mew glitch.--Phantomjunkie 23:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
No, it can evolve into a normal Geodude or Magnemite at level 255. These will behave like any other Geodude or Magnemite except that they are level 255 and have the moves they knew as a Glitchy Charizard. Well, and Magnemite will try to evolve into Geodude right after evolution, because that is what happens when a Pokémon evolves into two things at the same level. --SnorlaxMonster 02:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


I found it also evolving into a Snorlax hybrid at Lv61. Did anyone else experience that? Dominitzk 17:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Glitch Charizard

Glitchy Charizard is a name of pure conjecture and since a proper name can't be found due to the odd symbols used in its name I believe Glitch Charizard would be more appropriate than "Glitchy" Charizard. --Landfish7 01:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I would even prefer the unnamed glitch name of "Glitch (C7)" since it has no constant text name. And if this is moved, Glitchy Nidorino also should be moved. --SnorlaxMonster 01:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
I think Glitchy Charizard is fine. --Nathan2055talk 00:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
I just added a redirect for Glitch Charizard. --Nathan2055talk 00:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Moving the page to u

This Pokémon has the letter "u" in its name, can i move it? --×Rsrdaman× 17:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Interest in glitches

I am very interested in glitches. I have to help them avoid game freezes. I'm extremly

interested in this glitch Pokémon. Any info? --UltimateglitchDECTETIVE (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Have you read the page? There's information there. --Abcboy (talk) 21:38, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Why?

Does this thing learn Self-Destruct via TM36, or a move called Tm36? Hello, it's me, GalarChamp Cinderace! (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Simply clicking on that move moves you to the page with Glitch moves. Yes, move named TM-36 exists. Yes, this pokemon learns TM-36, not Self-Destruct. Itan (talk) 19:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Return to "U" page.