Page history
11 May 2024
21 April 2024
3 April 2024
2 April 2024
26 March 2024
16 March 2024
9 March 2024
18 February 2024
10 January 2024
28 December 2023
17 December 2023
15 November 2023
7 November 2023
3 November 2023
22 September 2023
19 September 2023
15 September 2023
14 September 2023
9 September 2023
4 September 2023
31 August 2023
30 August 2023
25 August 2023
24 August 2023
→External links
m+6
→Trivia: Condensing; I don't feel Paldean Wooper is particularly relevant here, for now
−204
→Trivia
+45
/* Trivia
m+246
adding link
+34
23 August 2023
22 August 2023
16 August 2023
13 August 2023
Undo revision 3768361 by DrPumpkinz (talk) The term "convergent evolution" wasn't the main issue. The issue is that 1 member of a group of 4 having something unique about it is not typically considered notable. Between any four Pokémon, each member is likely going to have things that it doesn't have in common with the other three. It's not really special or something that needs noting.
−149
→Trivia: better?
+149
12 August 2023
Undo revision 3767533 by DrPumpkinz (talk) small group. there are only four so-called "convergent evolutions".
−122
→Trivia: Yes, I've read the bit on the regional form talk page about convergent evolutions. It's still a better way of referring to the undeniably not-fanon phenomena of Wiglett, Wugtrio, Toedscool, and Toedscruel than "Pokemon that resembles another Pokemon but is actually biologically unrelated"
+122